Study Overview

This is the study overview page. Here you will find which goal and requisite contributions were reported by this study. If you are an author of this study, you can log in using your author username and password for this study and add or edit goal/requisite contributions.

Method fragments in this study

Here is a list of method fragment related to this study. Click on one to see its goal and requisite contributions as reported by this study.

Open Office Space

Goal contributions

Major Goal Minor Goal Contribution Value Situation
Improved Communication Enhanced knowledge transfer ++ In General

Requisite contributions

(S - Satisfied, PS - Partially Satisfied, U - Undefined, D - Denied, PD - Partly Denied)

Major Requisite Minor Requisite Requisite Satisfaction Value Situation

Study information

ID:
27

Name:
Aranda2007

URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RE.2007.54

Study Type:
Empirical Study

Study Format:
Case Study

Description:
NA

Organization:
NA

Year:
2007

Reference:
Aranda; J.; Easterbrook; S.; & Wilson; G. (2007). Requirements in the wild: How small companies do it. Requirements Engineering Conference; 2007. RE '07. 15th IEEE International; 39-48

Title of Paper:
NA

Conference Name:
NA

Abstract:
NA